Poliadisyon

Poliadisyon is a theoretical model of urban governance that emphasizes polycentric, multi-level decision-making across interconnected cities or districts. In this framework, authority is distributed among a network of autonomous jurisdictions—local councils, regional assemblies, and metropolitan bodies—that coordinate through shared institutions and agreements. Poliadisyon aims to combine local responsiveness with regional coherence, avoiding both centralized control and pure fragmentation.

Core features include subsidiarity-driven layering, participatory budgeting, and deliberative forums such as citizen assemblies that influence policy at multiple layers. Decision-making is often complemented by digital platforms that enable public deliberation, transparent data-sharing, and ongoing accountability mechanisms. Inter-jurisdictional compacts handle cross-border issues such as transportation, housing, and environmental policy, with dispute resolution procedures designed to prevent gridlock and ensure continuity of services.

The term Poliadisyon is a neologism used in contemporary political theory and speculative discourse. Its exact linguistic roots vary by author, but it is consistently associated with the city as the primary unit of political life and with governance that is durable yet adaptable to changing urban-scale needs. The concept is discussed in academic articles as a model for megacities, regional networks, and virtual or digitized urban spaces, and it is also used in speculative fiction to imagine resilient, community-centered governance.

Criticism centers on complexity, potential for policy inconsistency across jurisdictions, governance gaps during transitions, and the technical and institutional demands of maintained deliberative processes. Proponents counter that the approach can enhance legitimacy, resilience, and adaptability if designed with clear mandates, interoperability standards, and robust accountability.