Pardonangling

Pardonangling is a term that has emerged in discussions surrounding criminal justice reform and the use of executive clemency powers. It refers to the act of seeking or granting pardons for offenses that might not typically qualify for clemency under traditional interpretations. This can include a broad spectrum of offenses, from minor non-violent crimes to more serious offenses, and the rationale for seeking such pardons can vary widely.

The concept often arises when individuals or advocacy groups believe that existing laws or sentencing practices have led to unjust outcomes. They may argue that a pardon is necessary to correct an imbalance, facilitate rehabilitation, or address systemic issues within the justice system. This can involve situations where a person has served their time but still faces significant collateral consequences, or where there is a perceived disproportionate punishment for the offense committed.

The term "pardonangling" suggests a nuanced or perhaps even strategic approach to the pardon process. It can imply a proactive effort to identify individuals or cases that might benefit from clemency, even if not immediately obvious. This might involve researching legal precedents, gathering supporting evidence, and building a case for why a pardon is warranted. The effectiveness and appropriateness of "pardonangling" are subjects of ongoing debate, with proponents emphasizing its potential to offer second chances and address inequities, while critics may raise concerns about due process, fairness to victims, and the potential for political influence in the pardon process.