Monitudoksisia

Monitudoksisia is a philosophical concept describing a stance that privileges a single foundational belief as the basis for all knowledge, justification, and policy. The term is a constructed neologism rather than an established school, used in critical discussions and thought experiments to examine absolutist epistemic positions.

Etymology and scope: The word blends elements meaning "one" and "doxa" (belief) with a nominal suffix, producing a label for a theory that seeks a unified underlying principle. It is typically discussed in abstract contexts rather than as a recognized doctrine with widespread endorsement.

Core features include a single core doxa that guides justification, decision rules, and interpretation; mechanisms to evaluate new information against that core; and a tendency toward coherence and uniform application. Critics highlight risks of dogmatism, rigidity, and suppression of legitimate dissent.

Relation to other theories: Monitudoksisia is often compared with foundationalism and epistemic monism in philosophy, and with absolutist tendencies in political thought. In science, such a stance would resemble adopting a unique methodological standard across disciplines, sometimes aligning with unity-of-knowledge projects.

Criticism and defense: Proponents argue that a single standard can reduce ambiguity and conflict; opponents caution that it may ignore new evidence and minority perspectives. The term remains largely analytic and hypothetical, useful for examining the trade-offs between unity and pluralism in knowledge systems.