Antiteleological

Antiteleological refers to a stance or approach that opposes teleology, the explanation of phenomena in terms of purposes, end goals, or final causes. The term is formed from Greek anti- “against” and telos “end, goal,” plus the suffix -logical. In philosophy and theology, antiteleological positions critique the idea that natural processes or human actions are inherently directed toward ends; instead, they emphasize efficient causes, mechanisms, chance, or functional explanations without implying purpose.

In science, antiteleology manifests as mechanistic or causal explanations that do not invoke intrinsic aims. Historically, teleology appeared in natural philosophy and theological arguments about design; antiteleological critiques questioned whether apparent purposes require a design explanation. The development of Darwinian evolution is often cited as a naturalistic framework that accounts for complexity without invoking purposeful ends, contributing to an antiteleological reading of biological processes. However, some thinkers maintain teleological readings in biology or ethics, while others apply tempered teleology to certain domains (e.g., biological function as a stand-in for explanation rather than true purpose).

In ethics and aesthetics, antiteleological standpoints resist moral or evaluative judgments grounded in final ends in nature, preferring analyses based on cause, consequence, or convention. The term is also used in philosophy of religion to describe criticisms of natural theology's design arguments, or conversely as a stance within religious thought that emphasizes contingency rather than providential purpose.