överenskommelsepolicier

Overenskommelsepolicier is a proposed governance concept that centers on using negotiated agreements as the primary instrument for public policy. The term combines the Swedish word överenskommelse, meaning agreement or settlement, with policier (policy) and is used in some academic discussions to describe a framework where formal accords shape policy outcomes rather than unilateral mandates alone.

Definition and scope

An överenskommelsepolicier emphasizes reaching formal, binding or quasi-binding agreements among key stakeholders—such as government agencies, employers, workers organizations, civil society, and private sector actors. Agreements may take the form of memoranda of understanding, sectoral pacts, or treaty-like arrangements that set objectives, responsibilities, and timelines. The approach is applicable across areas such as labor relations, environmental governance, public procurement, and international cooperation.

Core components

- Inclusive negotiation processes that enable participation from diverse actors.

- Clear överenskommelser with defined goals, indicators, and monitoring arrangements.

- Enforcement and accountability mechanisms, including monitoring reports and dispute resolution.

- Transparency, data sharing, and regular review to align with changing circumstances.

- Layered governance, where national policies are supported by subnational or sector-specific accords.

Advantages and challenges

Benefits include greater legitimacy, reduced conflict, and potential for durable solutions through stakeholder buy-in. Challenges involve lengthy negotiations, power imbalances among participants, potential lack of enforceability without strong institutional backing, and the risk of stalemate if consensus cannot be reached.

Examples

In theory, a national climate policy could proceed as an överenskommelsepolicier by securing sector-specific pacts with industry groups, labor unions, and regional authorities, each with measurable milestones and joint reporting. In practice, the term remains more common in scholarly discussions than as an established, widely used policy label.