weerlegbare

Weerlegbare is a Dutch adjective that translates to "refutable" or "disprovable" in English. The term is derived from the verb *weerleggen*, which means to rebut or refute, combined with the suffix *–bare*, indicating the quality of being able to be refuted. It is commonly used in academic and philosophical contexts to describe arguments, hypotheses, or claims that can be challenged or disproved through evidence or logical analysis.

In practical use, weerlegbare is frequently paired with nouns such as *theorie* (theory) or *bewijs* (proof), forming phrases like *weerlegbare theorie* or *weerlegbaar bewijs*. The word conveys that a proposition is not absolute but is open to scrutiny and potential falsification. This concept aligns with Karl Popper’s criterion of falsifiability, which states that for a theory to be scientific it must be falsifiable, or in Dutch terms, weerlegbaar.

Grammatically, weerlegbare can be modified by adjectives and adverbs. Comparative and superlative forms are *werelgbaarder* and *werelgbaarste*, although these forms are rarely used in everyday speech. The word is part of a broader family of Dutch reflexive verbs that form adjectives, such as *liefbaar*, *vergeetbaar*, and *maatschappelijk*.

The concept of weerlegbaarheid also appears in legal discourse, where statutes or contractual clauses are described as weerlegbaar if they can be contested in court. In journalism, a claim may be labeled weerlegbaar to emphasize the necessity for verification. Overall, weerlegbare is a key term in critical thinking and evidentiary reasoning within Dutch-language scholarship and public discourse.