Home

syllabarybased

Syllabarybased describes writing systems in which each symbol encodes a syllable rather than an individual sound or morpheme. In a syllabary, the basic units represent syllables such as consonant–vowel combinations (for example, CV or CVC) and, in many scripts, a single glyph covers one syllable.

These systems contrast with alphabets, where letters map to phonemes, and with logographic systems, where symbols

Examples include Japanese kana (hiragana and katakana), which encode syllables to write native words and foreign

Advantages of syllabarybased scripts include relatively rapid reading of syllables and straightforward mapping from speech to

In modern use, syllabary-based scripts persist in various communities and are supported in digital encoding, with

represent
words
or
morphemes.
Syllabarybased
scripts
can
provide
a
compact
encoding
for
languages
with
relatively
simple
syllable
inventories
and
limited
consonant
clusters,
enabling
direct
phonetic
representation
of
spoken
forms.
loanwords;
the
Cherokee
syllabary;
and
the
Canadian
Aboriginal
syllabics
used
for
Cree,
Ojibwe,
and
Inuktitut.
The
Vai
syllabary
of
Liberia
and
the
Yi
script
of
the
Yi
languages
are
other
notable
syllabaries.
Some
systems
incorporate
diacritics
or
supplementary
glyphs
to
cover
tones
or
rare
syllables.
writing
for
common
syllable
structures.
Limitations
include
a
large
number
of
symbols
to
cover
all
possible
syllables,
difficulty
representing
languages
with
complex
consonant
clusters
or
tone
systems
without
additional
marks,
and
challenges
in
adapting
to
new
or
foreign
vocabulary.
Unicode
providing
blocks
for
Japanese
kana
and
a
range
of
indigenous
syllabaries.
The
choice
among
syllabary-based,
alphabetic,
or
logographic
systems
reflects
historical
development
and
the
phonological
needs
of
the
language.