Home

regulationalso

Regulationalso is a neologism used in some theoretical discussions to describe the cross-domain effects of regulatory actions. It denotes the phenomenon whereby regulations implemented in one policy area create, reveal, or necessitate regulatory considerations in other areas, leading to interconnected or overlapping governance requirements. The term combines regulation with the sense of “also,” signaling that regulation in one domain naturally triggers additional regulatory attention elsewhere.

Definition and scope

In its scholarly use, regulationalso refers to the interdependencies between regulatory regimes across sectors, jurisdictions, or

Applications and examples

Applications appear in environmental and energy policy, digital governance, financial regulation, and public health. For example,

Criticism and limitations

As a theoretical construct, regulationalso can be criticized for risk of overgeneralization or for complicating policy

Overall, regulationalso functions as a framework for analyzing how regulatory actions ripple across policy domains, highlighting

scales.
It
emphasizes
how
rules
in
one
domain
can
influence
compliance
obligations,
standards,
or
enforcement
practices
in
others.
Regulationalso
is
distinct
from,
but
related
to,
ideas
such
as
cross-cutting
regulation,
regulatory
spillovers,
and
harmonization
efforts.
The
concept
is
often
employed
in
regulatory
impact
assessments,
governance
analyses,
and
policy
design
to
anticipate
unintended
consequences
and
to
plan
for
coherence
across
multiple
policy
areas.
a
carbon
pricing
scheme
may
affect
industrial
regulations
and
transportation
rules,
creating
a
need
for
cross-domain
compliance
mechanisms.
Data
privacy
requirements
in
a
digital
service
can
influence
labor,
consumer
protection,
and
antitrust
considerations.
Cross-border
or
multi-jurisdictional
regulation
frequently
exhibits
regulationalso
dynamics
as
rules
are
aligned
or
adapted
to
fit
broader
regulatory
ecosystems.
design
with
algebraic-sounding
dependencies.
Practitioners
warn
that
focusing
on
cross-domain
effects
should
not
obscure
domain-specific
goals
and
that
careful
coordination
is
needed
to
avoid
regulatory
burden
or
conflict.
the
need
for
coherence
and
foresight
in
governance.