narrowheartedness

Narrowheartedness is a term used to describe a disposition characterized by limited empathy and concern that is selectively directed toward a restricted in‑group or set of immediate interests, while broader moral or communal concerns are downplayed. People described this way may show reluctance to help outsiders, to support policies that benefit distant or unfamiliar groups, or to extend generosity beyond familiar networks. The label is commonly used in political, sociological, and ethical discussion to contrast with broad‑mindedness or universalism.

Etymology and usage: The term combines narrow with heartedness; it is a neologism rather than a formal clinical diagnosis, and appears primarily in commentary, opinion writing, and some theoretical work on moral psychology and social identity.

Relation to psychology: Narrowheartedness overlaps with concepts such as parochialism, provincialism, and in‑group favoritism. It can arise from threat perception, fear of loss, and social identity concerns, and may be reinforced by cognitive biases like confirmation bias and motivated reasoning. In some analyses it is framed as a rational response to scarce resources, while in others it is treated as a moral deficiency.

Impact and examples: In governance or business, narrowhearted decisions may prioritize a local constituency or short‑term gain over broader welfare, environmental concerns, or global equity. In communities, it can manifest as hostility toward outsiders or minority groups, or as reluctance to invest in inclusive programs.

Critique: Some scholars argue that the term is value‑laden and risks stigmatizing legitimate prudence or localism; others emphasize that fostering inclusive concern requires structural changes and education, rather than labeling.

See also:

- parochialism

- provincialism

- in‑group favoritism

- moral psychology

- universalism

- empathy