eksitatoriseenvastaiseen

Eksitatoriseenvastaiseen is a neologism used in philosophy, rhetoric, and media studies to describe a deliberate argumentative tactic in which a participant engages with a contested position by first articulating a plausible counter-argument and then evaluating that counter-argument from within the same theoretical frame, with the goal of clarifying, testing, or refining the original claim. The term blends speculative coinage with a Finnish-like suffix and is not part of formal terminology; it appears in theoretical discussions and worldbuilding guides as a way to discuss how debates can be reframed by treating the opposite view as an object of analysis rather than as a mere target for dismissal.

In practice, eksitatoriseenvastaiseen unfolds in stages: identify the core claim of the other side; construct a plausible, well-formed counter-claim that the opposition might hold; evaluate that counter-claim using the same criteria as the original argument; and use the results to revise, extend, or nuance the initial position. The aim is transparency about premises and to reveal assumptions shared by both sides.

Applications include scholarly argument analysis, critical media studies, and fictional dialogue design, where it helps to explore tensions between viewpoints without resorting to caricature. Critics warn that if not carefully bounded, the technique can grant undue legitimacy to fringe or inconsistent positions, or become merely performative.