Pluralisban

Pluralisban is a neologism used in linguistics and rhetoric to describe the intentional avoidance of plural forms in speech and writing. The term blends the Latin pluralis with the word ban, signaling a prohibition on plural reference. In practice, pluralisban encompasses both grammatical choices—avoiding plural pronouns such as we, us, our, and avoiding plural verbs or collective nouns—and stylistic decisions that favor singular or impersonal constructions.

Proponents describe pluralisban as a tool for foregrounding individual accountability, reducing perceived collective authority in sensitive communications, or testing the effects of voice on audience trust. Critics argue that it can reduce clarity, obscure shared responsibility, and disrupt natural discourse, especially in contexts where group action is central. They also worry that overuse can produce awkward or contrived language and hinder effective collaboration.

Context and use: The concept is primarily discussed in theoretical linguistics, rhetoric, and some speculative or dystopian fiction as a thought experiment about power, voice, and governance. In practical terms, a pluralisban approach might require replacing “we will” with “the organization will” or “I will” and favor passive or agent-specific constructions to avoid collective agency.

Relation to other concepts: Pluralisban relates to historic notions such as pluralis majestatis (the royal we) and to debates about inclusive versus exclusive language, authority, and institutional rhetoric. It remains a niche topic used mainly to explore how voice and form shape interpretations of responsibility and legitimacy.