Paradigmaga

Paradigmaga is a theoretical construct in the social studies of science and innovation that describes a situation in which multiple paradigms coexist and interact within a discipline. The term is used to explore how groups, institutions, and technologies can operate under more than one core model for explaining phenomena, solving problems, and setting norms. Unlike models that assume a single dominant paradigm, paradigmaga emphasizes coexistence, dispute, and partial integration among competing frameworks.

Core ideas include cohabitation, wherein different paradigms are used in parallel; negotiation, where communities vote, publish, or fund research that legitimizes particular approaches; and transition pathways, which map how fields shift from one dominant framework to another or blend elements from several. The framework also considers governance mechanisms, metrics, and communication practices that influence paradigm selection.

Origins of the term are debated, and it has been applied across disciplines such as science and technology studies, organizational theory, and policy analysis. Proponents argue that paradigmaga provides a richer account of real-world research cultures, especially in interdisciplinary and rapidly changing domains. Critics, however, warn that the approach can dilute standards, complicate evaluation, and mask power imbalances.

In practice, paradigmaga can guide case studies of research programs, standard-setting processes, and strategic planning in organizations facing competing models. It offers analytic tools for mapping divergent assumptions, practicing negotiation, and planning cross-paradigmatic collaboration.