Konzekvencialista

Konzekvencialista is a neologism that emerged in the early 21st century within certain online philosophical and ethical communities. The term is a playful derivation of the English word “consequentialist,” with a deliberate alteration of spelling to emphasize a modern, digital-age perspective on moral theory. It is typically used to describe individuals who advocate for a consequentialist approach to decision-making, prioritizing the outcomes or consequences of actions over adherence to strict rules or duties.

The concept is rooted in utilitarian and consequentialist traditions that emerged during the Enlightenment, most notably in the works of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Konzekvencialistas argue that moral judgments should be grounded in empirical assessments of the benefits and harms produced by actions, rather than on rigid principle-based formulations. In practice, this stance often involves the use of data-driven analysis, cost-benefit calculations, and predictive modeling to guide policy and personal conduct.

Confusion occasionally arises because the spelling of the term has no fixed standard. Some writers prefer “konzekvencialista,” others “konsekventista,” and some use the traditional English spelling “consequentialist.” These variations reflect a broader trend toward linguistic play when adapting academic concepts to the informal channels of internet discourse.

Scholars analyzing contemporary ethical debates note that konzekvencialists frequently engage with issues such as AI ethics, climate policy, and public health, where decision makers must weigh complex long‑term outcomes. While the movement lacks a formal organizational structure, it has gained visibility through blogs, podcasts, and online forums dedicated to moral philosophy, where contributors debate the merits and limitations of a strictly outcome‑based ethics.