Brexitin

Brexitin is a term used in political science to describe a hypothetical model of withdrawal from a supranational union that emphasizes a staged and managed transition rather than an abrupt exit. In this model, a member state negotiates a formal withdrawal while simultaneously establishing a long-term framework for its future relationship with the union, balancing sovereignty with retained regulatory alignment during a transition period.

Origin and usage: The term emerged in scholarly simulations and policy discussions after debates around Brexit, used to explore outcomes when withdrawal is paired with continued cooperation on trade, security, and regulation. It is distinct from a clean-break approach by highlighting transitional arrangements and partial re-engagement during the exit process.

Key features: A two-phase process includes a withdrawal agreement and a transition arrangement. The transitional period provides legal continuity, allowing existing rules to apply while new terms are negotiated. The framework may include regulatory alignment in certain sectors, staged tariff and customs arrangements, and ongoing cooperation in areas such as security, research, or regional development. Additional bilateral or multilateral agreements may be pursued to replace elements of the prior membership.

Implications and criticisms: Proponents argue Brexitin can reduce disruption and preserve economic ties while political reforms unfold. Critics warn it can create legal uncertainty, delay structural changes, and impose complex governance challenges. The viability of such a model depends on negotiations, public support, and the strategic aims of the state.