Bosmansecuritys

Bosmansecuritys, also known as Bosman rulings, are a series of decisions by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) that have significantly impacted the employment law in the European Union. The Bosman rulings, named after the case Bosman v Heineken, were delivered in 1999 and 2002. They addressed the issue of the free movement of workers within the EU, particularly focusing on the transfer of players between football clubs.

The first Bosman ruling, delivered in 1999, held that players who had completed their professional careers in one EU country could freely move to another country without the need for a work permit. This decision was a significant departure from previous interpretations of EU law, which had restricted the free movement of workers to those with a valid work permit.

The second Bosman ruling, delivered in 2002, further clarified the first decision. It stated that players who were still under contract in one EU country could also freely move to another country, provided they had completed a certain number of games for their original club. This ruling had a profound impact on the football industry in Europe, as it allowed clubs to poach players from rival clubs without the need for a work permit.

The Bosman rulings have been widely criticized by some EU member states, particularly those with strong football traditions, as they have led to a significant increase in the number of foreign players in their leagues. However, the ECJ has maintained that the rulings are in line with the principles of the EU's acquis communautaire, which aims to promote the free movement of workers within the EU.

In summary, Bosmansecuritys are a series of ECJ decisions that have had a significant impact on the employment law in the EU, particularly in the football industry. The rulings have allowed for the free movement of players between EU countries, subject to certain conditions, and have been widely debated and criticized since their delivery.