Analytikosanalísis

Analytikosanalísis is a neologistic term used to describe a cross-disciplinary approach to analysis that blends analytic reasoning with interpretive or qualitative investigation. The word appears to fuse elements of Greek from analýtikos (analytic) with a form resembling the Spanish palabra análisis, signaling a synthesis of formal and contextual methods.

Definition and method: Analytikosanalísis emphasizes two complementary strands. A formal analytic strand employs logic, mathematics, formal semantics, or computational modeling. A contextual interpretive strand draws on qualitative methods such as discourse analysis, ethnography, or phenomenology. Practically, researchers frame a problem, develop parallel analytic tracks, and iteratively integrate findings to produce a coherent account. Transparency about assumptions, procedures, and limitations is central to the approach, aiding reproducibility and cross-method validation.

Applications and domains: The concept is discussed in philosophy, linguistics, cognitive science, political science, data science, and policy analysis. It is used to test theories with both rigorous formal structures and contextual evidence, to build models that remain robust across settings, and to evaluate complex phenomena such as language use, decision making, or social processes.

Reception and critique: As a relatively new term, analytikosanalísis lacks universal standardization. Proponents argue that it helps bridge the gap between rigor and context, while critics warn that the label can be vague without clear methodological guidelines and concrete protocols.

See also: analytic philosophy, mixed methods, data analysis, interdisciplinarity.