Home

Additur

Additur is a post-verdict remedy in civil procedure by which a court increases the amount of damages awarded by a jury. In jurisdictions that recognize it, the court may propose a higher award on the ground that the jury’s verdict is inadequate, but the increase is generally not imposed without the defendant’s consent or without offering the plaintiff the option of accepting the higher amount or going to a new trial.

Additur is distinguished from remittitur, which reduces an excessive verdict. The two doctrines reflect different directions

In the United States, the Seventh Amendment’s protection of the right to a jury trial has led

of
jury
adjustment:
remittitur
corrects
a
verdict
deemed
too
high,
while
additur
concerns
a
verdict
deemed
too
low.
The
use
of
additur
has
been
controversial
because
it
concerns
the
role
of
the
jury
and
concerns
about
due
process
and
the
integrity
of
the
jury
system.
federal
courts
to
prohibit
additur
in
most
circumstances,
while
allowing
remittitur
as
a
mechanism
to
trim
excessive
awards—typically
with
the
plaintiff
choosing
between
accepting
a
reduced
amount
or
retrying
the
case.
State
approaches
vary:
some
jurisdictions
historically
permitted
additur
under
certain
conditions,
while
others
restrict
or
prohibit
it,
or
limit
its
availability
to
specific
contexts.
Today,
additur
is
rarely
used
in
practice,
and
remittitur
remains
the
more
common
post-verdict
remedy
for
adjusting
jury
awards.
See
also
remittitur
and
jury
trial
rights.