360arviointia

360arviointia, also known as 360-degree feedback or 360-degree review, is a performance appraisal process that involves collecting feedback from multiple sources, including peers, subordinates, and supervisors, to provide a comprehensive evaluation of an individual's performance. The term "360-degree" refers to the fact that feedback is gathered from all directions, offering a holistic view of an employee's strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement.

The process typically begins with the individual being evaluated selecting a group of raters who are familiar with their work and can provide valuable insights. These raters are usually chosen from the individual's team, department, or organization, and may include supervisors, colleagues, subordinates, and even customers or clients. The raters are then asked to complete a feedback form or questionnaire, providing their perspectives on the individual's performance.

The feedback collected is then analyzed and synthesized to create a comprehensive report that highlights the individual's strengths, areas for improvement, and development opportunities. This report is often shared with the individual, along with any relevant feedback from the raters, to facilitate self-reflection and goal setting.

360arviointia is widely used in organizations to promote transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement. It helps employees gain a better understanding of their performance from different perspectives, identify blind spots, and develop strategies for personal and professional growth. Additionally, 360arviointia can help managers and organizations identify patterns and trends in performance, allocate resources effectively, and make informed decisions about training, development, and succession planning.

However, 360arviointia also has its challenges and limitations. It can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, requiring careful planning and coordination. Additionally, the quality of the feedback depends on the objectivity and honesty of the raters, which may be influenced by personal biases, relationships, or political considerations. To mitigate these risks, organizations should establish clear guidelines, provide training to raters, and ensure confidentiality and anonymity in the feedback process.