Home

religiositet

Religiositet, or religiosity, denotes the degree to which individuals express religious beliefs, participate in worship and rituals, and align with the norms and practices of a religious tradition. It can include cognitive components (doctrinal beliefs), behavioral components (worship, prayer, observance), experiential aspects (felt sense of the sacred), and social aspects (identity and belonging within a faith community).

In sociology and psychology, religiosity is often analyzed using a multi-dimensional approach. A classic distinction is

Measurement of religiosity relies on validated scales. The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL) assesses organizational and

Religiosity varies across regions, cultures, and historical periods. Secularization theories argue that modernization reduces religious commitment

In research, religiosity is linked in varying ways to well-being, moral reasoning, social capital, and health,

Distinctions from spirituality and religious identity are common points of debate in academic discourse.

between
intrinsic
religiosity—internal,
personally
motivated
commitment
to
religious
beliefs—and
extrinsic
religiosity,
pursued
for
social
or
practical
benefits.
Glock
and
Stark
proposed
five
dimensions:
belief,
practice,
experience,
knowledge,
and
consequences
of
religious
life
on
behavior
and
society.
non-organizational
religious
activity
and
intrinsic
religiosity,
while
the
Religious
Commitment
Inventory
(RCI-10)
and
other
instruments
capture
centrality
and
depth
of
commitment.
Cross-cultural
comparisons
must
account
for
different
religious
landscapes
and
languages.
in
many
societies,
yet
religious
vitality
remains
strong
in
others,
and
global
interconnectedness
increases
exposure
to
plural
beliefs.
Demographic
patterns
show
differences
by
gender,
age,
education,
and
socioeconomic
status,
though
findings
are
not
uniform.
but
results
are
mixed
and
often
contingent
on
which
dimensions
are
measured
and
how
outcomes
are
defined.
Causation
is
difficult,
and
measurement
issues,
including
cultural
bias
and
response
style,
complicate
interpretation.