matusetalitusi

Matusetalitusi is a neologism that has appeared in informal discussions about scholarly attribution and citation practices. The term fuses a placeholder surname with the Latin phrase et al. and a suffix to create a coined element used to illustrate debates about how credit should be assigned in multi-author works. It is not recognized as a formal term in major bibliometric or publishing guidelines.

Origin and usage

The word seems to have originated in online forums and editorial discussions as a thought experiment rather than as an officially adopted standard. It is typically referenced to discuss the tension between giving prominence to core contributors and acknowledging the broader team behind a research project. Because it lacks formal definition or endorsement, its exact meaning can vary between discussions, with some treating it as a critique of conventional author lists and others as a hypothetical model for credit distribution.

Description

In the contexts where it is mentioned, matusetalitusi is presented as a conceptual framework or rhetorical device rather than a proven method. Proponents use the term to prompt questions about transparency in authorship, the visibility of collaborators, and fairness in credit allocation. Critics caution that introducing new nomenclature could further complicate established citation practices and indexing.

Relation to existing concepts

Matusetalitusi sits alongside broader conversations about et al. usage, author order, contributorship taxonomies, and bibliometrics. It is often cited in discussions about reforming publication practices, but it has not led to any formal adoption or standardized guidelines.

See also

Et al., authorship, contributorship, bibliometrics, citation practices.

References

There are no formal publications that define matusetalitusi as an established term; references are limited to informal discussions and opinion pieces that use it as a hypothetical concept.