categoricalness

Categoricalness is the quality or state of being categorical: unconditional, absolute, and often framed as universally applicable. In ordinary use it contrasts with conditional or hypothetical claims. The term is not a standard technical label in most disciplines, but it appears in philosophical and analytical writing to discuss the degree to which a claim asserts applicability without requiring conditions.

In philosophy and logic, categoricalness is often discussed in relation to categories, judgments, and the nature of assertion. In Kantian philosophy, judgments are classified as categorical or hypothetical; a categorical judgment is claimed to be true independently of any condition. In Aristotelian logic, categorical propositions make universal or particular claims about all members of a subject class, and discussions of categoricalness focus on the strength and scope of such claims as unconditionally applicable.

In ethics and normative theory, the notion of a categorical imperative exemplifies maximal categoricalness: an ethical principle regarded as universally binding regardless of contingent desires or circumstances. In this sense, categoricalness characterizes norms that are treated as non-negotiable.

In linguistics and cognitive science, researchers may study the categoricalness of categorization processes—how readily individuals assign stimuli to discrete categories or how sharply defined a category boundary is. This use treats categoricalness as a property of perceptual or cognitive organization rather than of a proposition or command.

Because the term can be ambiguous without context, authors typically specify whether they mean ontological, logical, epistemic, or normative categoricalness. See also categorization, categoricity, categorical syllogism, and categorical imperative.