Genovervejelse

Genovervejelse, or reconsideration, is the Danish term for the act of re-examining a decision or policy within an organization, most often in public administration, to assess whether the decision remains appropriate in light of new information, changed circumstances, or identified errors.

It is distinct from an appeal; genovervejelse is typically an internal review aimed at correcting mistakes, refining reasoning, or accommodating new facts without the adversarial structure of a court appeal. The process may be initiated by the affected individual, a supervisor, or another responsible party.

Procedural elements commonly include the submission of new evidence or arguments, a documented review by an appropriate authority or committee, and a decision that may confirm, modify, or overturn the original outcome. In some systems, the reconsideration must occur within a defined time limit.

Scope and effect: The result of a genovervejelse can range from unchanged decisions to partial or full revision. The binding nature of the outcome and whether it can be reviewed further depends on law, policy, and the governing institution.

Relation to broader administrative law: Genovervejelse is intended to improve accuracy and fairness in decision-making but may also cause delays or inconsistencies if access is uneven. Critics highlight the risk of repetitive reconsiderations in lengthy disputes.