Allmoving

Allmoving is a term used in urban mobility discourse to describe a mobility philosophy and social movement that envisions urban life as a continually moving ecosystem. Proponents argue that reducing stationary time and fostering seamless transitions between modes—on foot, by bicycle, by public transit, or through flexible work travel—can increase access to opportunities, lower emissions, and improve resilience. The term is used across planning debates, advocacy work, and academic discourse, without referring to a single organization.

Origins and scope: The concept emerged in the early 2020s as part of broader discussions about smart cities, mobility-as-a-service, and transit-oriented development. It encompasses a family of initiatives and ideas rather than a centralized program, shared by planners, engineers, policymakers, and community groups who seek to orient infrastructure and policy around movement patterns.

Core principles: Prioritize multi-modal networks with transit-first design; create continuous, legible corridors for walking and cycling; deploy adaptive, data-informed infrastructure to respond to demand; ensure equitable access across neighborhoods and income groups; pursue environmental sustainability by reducing idle time and vehicle miles traveled; and encourage flexible work and living arrangements to smooth flows.

Implementation and examples: Cities have piloted pop-up bike lanes, dynamic bus routing, last-mile hubs, and digital planning tools aimed at measuring mobility outcomes rather than fixed capacity. Guidance documents describe funding models, zoning changes, and performance metrics focused on flow and accessibility.

Reception and critique: Supporters argue that allmoving can make cities more livable, resilient, and just by centering movement. Critics raise concerns about privacy, surveillance, displacement, and the costs of large-scale infrastructure. Proponents emphasize governance, safeguards, and inclusive stakeholder engagement to address these issues.