Home

Abduktives

Abductive reasoning, or abduction, is a form of logical inference that starts from an observation and seeks the most plausible explanation. It differs from deduction, which derives necessary conclusions from general rules, and from induction, which generalizes from repeated occurrences. In some German-language texts, the term abduktives is used to refer to this mode of reasoning.

Origin and concept: The concept is most closely associated with the philosopher Charles Sanders Peirce, who

Process and evaluation: An abductive inference emphasizes explanatory power, simplicity, coherence with existing knowledge, and potential

Applications and implementations: In science, abduction is used to formulate hypotheses that guide experimentation. In medicine,

Limitations: Abduction does not establish the truth of a hypothesis and can produce several competing explanations.

identified
abduction
as
a
distinct
form
of
inference
alongside
deduction
and
induction.
Abduction
aims
to
generate
hypotheses
that
would,
if
true,
make
the
observed
facts
unsurprising.
It
is
typically
the
first
step
in
inquiry,
providing
starting
points
for
further
investigation
and
testing
rather
than
definitive
proofs.
falsifiability.
The
chosen
hypothesis
should
offer
a
reasonable
explanation
for
the
observed
data
and
be
testable
through
further
observation
or
experiment.
In
practice,
abduction
often
yields
multiple
plausible
explanations,
which
then
require
comparison
and
empirical
scrutiny.
diagnostic
reasoning
often
proceeds
abductively,
proposing
likely
causes
for
a
set
of
symptoms.
In
forensics
and
intelligence
analysis,
abductive
reasoning
helps
generate
likely
scenarios
based
on
available
clues.
In
artificial
intelligence,
abductive
approaches
model
how
systems
can
produce
explanations
for
observations
and
support
hypothesis-driven
reasoning,
sometimes
within
probabilistic
or
logic-based
frameworks.
Its
conclusions
depend
on
the
quality
of
data
and
background
knowledge,
and
they
require
validation
through
further
testing
and
evidence.