luckegalitarians

Luckegalitarianism is a philosophical view that aims to distinguish between morally arbitrary factors that should be compensated for and those that should not. It suggests that inequalities are only just if they are the result of luck, meaning choices for which individuals can be held responsible. If an outcome is due to bad luck, such as an unchosen disability or a natural disaster, then luckegalitarianism implies that society has a reason to mitigate or compensate for this misfortune. Conversely, if an outcome is the result of bad choices, such as reckless behavior or a poor career decision, then luckegalitarianism suggests that individuals should bear the consequences of those choices.

The core idea is to level the playing field by removing the impact of bad luck while allowing for differences in outcomes based on responsible choices. This philosophy seeks to create a society where people are not penalized for circumstances beyond their control, but are accountable for the paths they actively choose. It is a concept that has been influential in discussions about distributive justice and the role of the state in addressing inequality.

Different interpretations of luckegalitarianism exist, particularly regarding the precise definition of "luck" and "choice." Some versions focus on option luck, which arises from choices made under conditions of risk, while others emphasize brute luck, which is entirely unchosen. The practical implications of implementing luckegalitarian principles in policy are also a subject of ongoing debate.