besserSchlechter

besserSchlechter is a term used in value theory, design discourse, and policy analysis to describe situations in which an action or change yields simultaneous improvements in some dimensions of value and deteriorations in others. The word fuses the German adjectives besser (better) and schlechter (worse), signaling that overall judgment depends on which criteria are prioritized and by whom.

As a conceptual framework, besserSchlechter highlights trade-offs and the plurality of legitimate values. It warns against assuming that progress in one metric implies universal progress, and it invites explicit discussion of which criteria matter, how they are measured, and how competing interests are balanced.

Applications appear in technology, urban planning, and public policy. For example, a software update may increase processing speed (a better outcome) while reducing accessibility for some users (a worse outcome). A transportation policy might reduce travel time for commuters (better) but raise noise or air pollution for residents nearby (worse).

Critics argue that besserSchlechter can become a vague justification for questionable trade-offs unless anchored in transparent criteria and stakeholder deliberation. Proponents note its value for clarifying competing objectives, identifying Pareto-improving options, and avoiding overconfident claims of overall improvement.

See also: Pareto efficiency, multi-criteria decision analysis, trade-off, value pluralism.