Konzisztense

Konzisztense was a term used in the early 20th-century analytical philosophy, particularly in the works of philosophers such as Hans Kelsen and others in the Austrian school. The concept refers to the idea of underlying assumptions or unrevealed premises that influence an argument's logical structure. In essence, koncisztense pertains to the implicit or unconscious presumptions that shape an individual's reasoning.

Philosophers employed the term koncisztense to describe how certain statements or ideas inevitably lead to unexamined assumptions, which, in turn, validate the original claim. It is a rhetorical device meant to expose these tacit suppositions. This concept is crucial in critical examination as it allows for the identification and evaluation of premises upon which one's reasoning relies.

Hans Kelsen, in particular, used koncisztense to illustrate how people often assume self-evident truths without critically examining them. By highlighting these assumptions, Kelsen aimed to clarify the genuine principles behind an argument rather than the overarching argument itself.

In essence, koncisztense serves as a critical tool for philosophers to dissect underlying presumptions and challenge unfounded dogma. By demystifying the notion that certain truths are merely self-evident, philosophers like Kelsen hoped to encourage more genuine inquiry and pinpoint the axioms that underpin an argument.

The term koncisztense was specifically used in the realm of analytical philosophy to uncover the hidden underpinnings of an argument.