Bloodcentered

Bloodcentered is an adjective used in cultural studies, literary criticism, and related fields to describe discourses, theories, or narratives that treat blood—biological lineage or hereditary attributes—as the central criterion for identity, status, or moral worth. The term is primarily descriptive, applied to analyses of nationalist, ethnic, or genealogical claims that rely on bloodlines to determine belonging. It is not a formal ideology, but a lens for evaluating how language and policy invoke blood as a mark of superiority or exclusion.

Origins and usage: Bloodcentered discourse is common in discussions of essentialist nationalism, eugenics, or racial ideologies, where ancestry is presented as evidence of natural hierarchies. In literary and media studies, bloodcentered worldbuilding describes fictional settings that foreground bloodlines, inherited power, or blood ties as determinative elements of character and plot. The term is also used to critique arguments that civic rights, citizenship, or human value are reducible to blood status.

Criticism: Critics view bloodcentered reasoning as scientifically unfounded and ethically troubling, reflecting social constructions rather than biological facts. Scholars emphasize that identity is negotiated through culture, law, and choice, not merely heredity. Related concepts include blood quantum, lineage, and bloodline. See also: blood quantum, lineage, essentialism, nationalism, eugenics, genealogy.