metaética

Metaética refers to the branch of ethics that examines the nature, foundations, and scope of moral principles, judgments, and reasoning. Unlike normative ethics, which focuses on determining what actions are morally right or wrong, metaethics seeks to understand the meaning and justification of moral concepts themselves. It explores questions such as whether moral statements are objective truths, subjective preferences, or cultural constructs, and how moral knowledge is acquired.

One central debate in metaethics concerns the nature of moral properties. Some philosophers, known as moral realists, argue that moral facts exist independently of human beliefs and are objective, much like mathematical truths. Others, called moral anti-realists, contend that moral statements lack objective truth or meaning, instead being expressions of emotion, convention, or personal preference. Within anti-realism, views range from moral subjectivism, which holds that moral judgments are expressions of individual attitudes, to moral relativism, which asserts that moral truths vary across cultures or contexts.

Metaethics also investigates the epistemology of ethics, questioning how individuals can justify moral claims and whether moral knowledge is possible. Some approaches, such as moral intuitionism, suggest that moral truths are directly accessible through intuition, while others, like moral cognitivism, argue that moral reasoning follows logical and evidential standards similar to other forms of knowledge.

Additionally, metaethics explores the relationship between morality and language, examining whether moral terms have literal meaning or are merely emotive or prescriptive. Philosophers like J.L. Austin and A.J. Ayer have contributed to this discussion by analyzing the linguistic structure of moral statements.

Metaethics plays a foundational role in ethical theory, shaping how moral questions are approached and debated. By clarifying the assumptions underlying moral reasoning, it helps distinguish between empirical claims about human behavior and normative claims about what ought to be. The field continues to evolve, integrating insights from philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science to deepen our understanding of moral thought and practice.