keqinterpretimeve

Keqinterpretimeve is a fictional metric proposed for discussions of interpretive equivalence in linguistics, cognitive science, and artificial intelligence. The term is not used in formal literature and serves as a thought-experiment construct to analyze how similarly different agents interpret the same input over time.

Definition and scope: Keqinterpretimeve aims to quantify the degree to which multiple interpreters arrive at equivalent interpretations for a utterance, sentence, or short discourse, while accounting for the time required to reach that interpretation and the persistence of that interpretation across subsequent exposure.

Components: The metric conceptually combines interpretive accuracy relative to a reference interpretation, time-to-interpretation, and cross-agent consistency. Interpretive accuracy measures how close a given interpretation is to a chosen gold standard or consensus; time-to-interpretation captures latency until a stable interpretation is formed; cross-agent consistency assesses agreement across interpreters across trials.

Calculation concept: In practice, a score would be derived from normalizing each component to a 0–1 scale and combining them with weights. The resulting keqinterpretimeve value lies between 0 and 1, with higher values indicating greater interpretive equivalence under the tested conditions.

Applications and examples: The concept is used in hypothetical studies comparing human readers and AI language models on tasks such as word-sense disambiguation, metaphor understanding, or moral judgment under time pressure. A high score suggests parallel interpretations and rapid convergence.

Limitations: As a fictional construct, keqinterpretimeve depends on subjective reference standards, experimental design, and measurement of time latency. It may not be comparable across studies with different protocols.

See also: inter-annotator agreement, Cohen's kappa, response latency, interpretive resilience.