Keloistas

Keloistas is a term used to refer to the plaintiffs in the landmark United States Supreme Court case Kelo v. City of New London, decided in 2005. The case centered around the power of local governments to seize private property for public use, even if the property owners are compensated. The plaintiffs, represented by the Kelo Institute, argued that the New London, Connecticut, city's plan to redevelop a blighted area by seizing private property for public use violated the Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause, which protects property rights.

The Keloistas included several homeowners whose properties were targeted for redevelopment. The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, ruled in favor of the city, stating that the government has the power to seize private property for public use, provided that the property is used for a public purpose and that the owners are fairly compensated. The decision sparked widespread debate and criticism, as it was seen as undermining property rights and encouraging government overreach.

The term "Keloistas" has since become a shorthand for those who advocate for the right of local governments to seize private property for public use, even if it means taking away the property owners' homes. The case has been cited in subsequent legal challenges and debates over property rights and government power.