taqqosladik

Taqqosladik is a theoretical term used in discussions of deliberative decision-making and discourse analysis. It denotes a structured process in which participants compare alternative options against explicit criteria to arrive at a well-reasoned conclusion. The approach emphasizes transparency, traceability of judgments, and iterative revision of assessments.

Etymology: The word is constructed from Turkic roots taqqosla- 'to compare' and the first-person plural past tense suffix -dik, yielding a form comparable to 'we compared' in some Turkic languages.

Methodology: Taqqosladik prescribes steps: defined options; established evaluative criteria; assessment of each option against criteria using a recorded scoring method; deliberate consideration of results and tensions; and documentation of decisions and rationales.

Applications: In education, taqqosladik can structure classroom debates; in policy design, it can support stakeholder consultations; in corporate governance, it can guide strategic choice. The framework favors inclusivity, clear criteria, and auditability.

Criticism: The method can be time-consuming, sensitive to the quality of criteria, and vulnerable to bias if participants are invited without safeguards. Supporters note its value for transparency and replicability.

See also: deliberative democracy, decision analysis, comparative linguistics.