casuistiskt

Casuistry is a method of ethical reasoning that involves analyzing specific cases to determine the correct moral action. It focuses on the details of a particular situation, contrasting it with similar past cases and established moral principles. The term originates from the Latin word "casus," meaning "case." Historically, casuistry was a prominent method in theological and philosophical ethics, particularly within the Catholic tradition, where it was used to resolve difficult moral dilemmas.

The process of casuistry typically involves identifying the relevant facts of a case, comparing them to precedents or rules, and then applying moral principles to reach a judgment. It acknowledges that general moral rules may have exceptions and that the specific circumstances can significantly alter the moral implications of an action. This approach can be useful for addressing complex ethical questions where simple application of rules might lead to an unjust outcome.

However, casuistry has also faced criticism. Some argue that it can be used to justify morally questionable actions by emphasizing loopholes or mitigating circumstances. Others suggest that it can be overly legalistic and detached from the lived experience of moral agents. Despite these criticisms, casuistry continues to be a relevant, albeit less dominant, approach in contemporary ethical discussions, particularly in fields like bioethics and medical ethics where nuanced case analysis is often required.