Majeurmajeure

Majeurmajeure is a coined term used in theoretical discussions to describe an expanded doctrine that blends the traditional concept of force majeure with the idea of major, systemic disruptions. The term is not established in formal legal dictionaries or widely adopted in practice; it appears mainly in speculative writings and scholarly conversations about risk allocation in the face of large-scale events.

Etymology and concept

The word 서로 combines elements of French origin—majeur (major) and majeure (the feminine form)—to evoke a heightened form of unforeseen disruption. As a hypothetical doctrine, majeurmajeure would extend the reach of force majeure beyond ordinary, unforeseeable events to include major global or societal shocks that profoundly affect contractual performance.

Scope and applications

Proposed applications include both private and public contracts in critical sectors such as infrastructure, energy, and supply chains. A majeurmajeure framework would address whether performance can be suspended, renegotiated, or terminated when a major disruption occurs, and how responsibility is allocated between parties. It would interact with existing concepts like force majeure, frustration of purpose, or material adverse changes, often requiring an evaluation of foreseeability, proportionality, and the impact on the contract’s purpose.

Mechanisms and criticisms

Under such a concept, triggering events might prompt relief measures, protective remedies, or government intervention. Critics argue that it could introduce vagueness and predictability concerns, risking overreach or opportunistic use. Given its status as a speculation rather than a settled doctrine, majeurmajeure remains a topic for theoretical debate rather than an established legal rule. See also: force majeure, frustration of purpose.